Keyboard shortcuts

Press or to navigate between chapters

Press S or / to search in the book

Press ? to show this help

Press Esc to hide this help

Relationship to Other Chapters

Chapter X integrates melodic transformation with previously developed techniques:

  • Chapter I (Charm of Impossibilities): Developmental procedures serve the broader aesthetic of creating complex, voluptuous music expressing religious sentiments—technique enables transcendence.

  • Chapter III (Added Values): Interversion examples (Example 126) incorporate added values and elongated descents through dot addition, showing melodic and rhythmic transformations operating simultaneously.

  • Chapter IV (Augmented or Diminished Rhythms): Elimination can involve rhythmic as well as melodic reduction; augmentation combines with registral change (Example 128) to create expressive intensification.

  • Chapter VIII (Melody and Melodic Contours): Interversion was "foreseen" in Chapter VIII (Example 99 discussed contrary motion, normal motion, retrograde, and interversion), making this chapter a systematic development of techniques previewed earlier.

  • Chapter XIV (Special Chords): Example 123 borrows harmonies from "chord of resonance" (Chapter XIV), demonstrating that melodic development occurs within specific harmonic contexts defined by characteristic chord types.

  • Chapter XVI (Modes of Limited Transposition): Interversion examples maintain Mode 5 content (Example 125–126), showing that pitch reordering preserves modal identity—developmental variety within symmetrical constraints.

The chapter demonstrates that melody, like rhythm, can undergo systematic transformation through defined operations (elimination, interversion, registral displacement). This extends the parametric thinking developed in rhythmic chapters to melodic domain, reinforcing the treatise's underlying principle: all musical parameters can be organized through parallel systematic procedures.

The invocation of Beethoven, d'Indy, Berg, and Jolivet positions Messiaen within a developmental tradition spanning Classicism to modernism—not revolutionary rejection but synthetic evolution.